• Study
  • Data Usage
    • Access & download data
    • Responsible use
    • Acknowledgment
  • Documentation
    • Curation & structure
    • Non-imaging
    • Imaging
    • Substudies
    • Release notes
  • Tools
    • Data tools
    • R Packages
  • Info
    • FAQs
    • Report issues
    • Changelog
    • Cite this website
  • Version
    • empty
  1. Imaging data
  2. Scan types
  3. Documentation
  4. Imaging
  5. Diffusion MRI
  • Curation & structure
    • Data structure
    • Curation standards
    • Naming convention
    • Metadata
  • Non-imaging data
    • ABCD (General)
    • Friends, Family, & Community
    • Genetics
    • Linked External Data
    • Mental Health
    • Neurocognition
    • Novel Technologies
    • Physical Health
    • Substance Use
  • Imaging data
    • Administrative tables
    • Data types
      • Documentation
        • Imaging
          • Concatenated
          • MRI derivatives data documentation
          • Source data / raw data
          • Supplementary tables
    • Scan types
      • Documentation
        • Imaging
          • Diffusion MRI
          • MRI Quality Control
          • Resting-state fMRI
          • Structural MRI
          • Task-based fMRI
          • Task-based fMRI (Behavioral performance)
          • Trial level behavioral performance during task-based fMRI
    • ABCD BIDS Community Collection (ABCC)
      • Documentation
        • Imaging
          • ABCD-BIDS community collection
          • BIDS conversion
          • Data processing
          • Derivatives
          • Quality control procedures
  • Substudy data
    • COVID-19 rapid response research
    • Endocannabinoid
    • IRMA
    • MR Spectroscopy
  • Release notes
    • 6.0 data release

On this page

  • Domain overview
    • Image processing
    • Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) analysis
    • Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI)
    • Regions of interest (ROIs)
  • Notes
    • Effects of scanner instance and software version
  1. Imaging data
  2. Scan types
  3. Documentation
  4. Imaging
  5. Diffusion MRI

Diffusion MRI

Domain overview

Please scroll horizontally to view the number of variables and events of administration for the displayed tables.

The Diffusion MRI (DTI) data contains imaging field maps, non-diffusion weighted images with opposite phase encode polarity, and multi-b-value, multi-direction diffusion weighted images.

Image processing

  • Eddy current distortion correction with a nonlinear estimation using diffusion gradient orientations and amplitudes to predict the pattern of distortions (Zhuang et al. 2006)
  • Head motion corrected by registering to images synthesized from tensor fit (Hagler et al. 2019)
  • Diffusion gradients adjusted for head rotation (Hagler et al. 2009; Leemans and Jones 2009)
  • Robust diffusion tensor estimation (Chang, Jones, and Pierpaoli 2005) used to identify and replace dark slices caused by abrupt head motion
  • B0 distortions were corrected using the reversing gradient method with FMRIB Software Library’s topup (Andersson, Skare, and Ashburner 2003; Smith et al. 2004)
  • Gradient nonlinearity distortion correction (Jovicich et al. 2006)
  • T2-weighted b=0 images to T1w structural images using mutual information (Wells et al. 1996)
  • Resampled into a standard orientation with 1.7 mm isotropic resolution

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) analysis

mr_y_dti

  • Conventional DTI methods (Basser, Mattiello, and LeBihan 1994; Le Bihan et al. 2001; Pierpaoli et al. 1996)
  • Two modeling approaches
    • DTI inner shell (DTIIS): b values > 1000 excluded from tensor fitting. DTI inner shell may be useful when comparing results to other, single-shell diffusion studies, particularly for MD, LD, or TD.
    • DTI full shell (DTIFS): all b values used in the tensor fitting DTI full shell is recommended for most applications.
  • Measures of microstructural tissue properties
    • Fractional anisotropy (FA)
    • Mean diffusivity (MD)
    • Longitudinal (or axial) diffusivity (LD)
    • Transverse (or radial) diffusivity (TD)

Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI)

mr_y_rsi

  • Linear estimation approach allowing for mixtures of “restricted”, “hindered”, and “free” diffusion pools within individual voxels (N. S. White et al. 2013; Nathan S. White et al. 2014)
  • Takes advantage of multiple b-value acquisition
  • Two signal fractions modeled as fiber orientation density (FOD) functions
    • Longitudinal diffusivity constant for both fractions, with a value of 1.0 x 10-3 mm2/s
    • Restricted fraction (e.g. intracellular): transverse diffusivity modelled as 0
    • Hindered fraction (e.g. extracellular): transverse diffusivity modelled as 0.9 x 10-3 mm2/s
  • One signal fractions modeled as isotropic free water diffusion
    • Free fraction (e.g., CSF): isotropic diffusivity modeled as 3.0 x10-3 mm2/s
  • Measures derived from the RSI model fit (see Supplementary Tables)
    • Restricted normalized isotropic (RNI, previously N0)
      • The 0th order spherical harmonic coefficient of the restricted fraction divided by the Euclidean norm (square root of the sum of squares) of all model coefficients
    • Restricted normalized directional or “neurite density” (RND, previously ND)
      • Norm of the 2nd and 4th order spherical harmonic coefficients of the restricted fraction divided by the norm of all model coefficients
    • Restricted normalized total (RNT, previously NT)
      • Norm of the 0th, 2nd, and 4th order spherical harmonic coefficients of the restricted fraction divided by the norm of all model coefficients
    • Hindered normalized isotropic (HNI, previously N0_s2)
      • The 0th order spherical harmonic coefficient of the hindered fraction divided by the norm of all model coefficients
    • Hindered normalized directional (HND, previously ND_s2)
      • Norm of the 2nd and 4th order spherical harmonic coefficients of the hindered fraction divided by the norm of all model coefficients
    • Hindered normalized total (HNT, aka NT_s2)
      • Norm of the 0th, 2nd, and 4th order spherical harmonic coefficients of the hindered fraction divided by the norm of all model coefficients
    • Free normalized isotropic (FNI)
      • The 0th order spherical harmonic coefficient of the free water fraction divided by the norm of all model coefficients

Regions of interest (ROIs)

  • Subcortical structures labeled with atlas-based segmentation (Fischl et al. 2002)
  • Cortical regions labeled with the Desikan atlas-based classification (Desikan et al. 2006)
  • Cortical regions labeled with the Destrieux atlas-based classification (Destrieux et al. 2010)
  • White and gray matter values sampled near gray/white boundary (Elman et al. 2017)
  • Major white matter tracts labelled using AtlasTrack (Hagler et al. 2009)
    • Voxels containing primarily gray matter or cerebral spinal fluid excluded from analysis
  • Atlas files and additional AtlasTrack documentation available here.

Notes

Effects of scanner instance and software version

Multisite longitudinal MRI imaging data are potentially susceptible to influences of scanning parameters, scanner manufacturer, scanner model, and software version, which vary across sites, and sometimes across time. For diffusion imaging, parameters obtained from different scanner manufacturers/models have been found to vary substantially. For more information, please refer to the “Effects of scanner instance and software version” in Imaging Overview data documentation.

Additional references:

  • Dick et al. (2021)
  • Dudley et al. (2023)
  • Fortin et al. (2017)
  • Holland, Kuperman, and Dale (2010)
  • Palmer et al. (2022)

References

Andersson, Jesper L. R., Stefan Skare, and John Ashburner. 2003. NeuroImage 20 (2): 870–88. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7.
Basser, P. J., J. Mattiello, and D. LeBihan. 1994. Biophysical Journal 66 (1): 259–67. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80775-1.
Chang, Lin-Ching, Derek K. Jones, and Carlo Pierpaoli. 2005. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 53 (5): 1088–95. doi:10.1002/mrm.20426.
Desikan, Rahul S., Florent Ségonne, Bruce Fischl, Brian T. Quinn, Bradford C. Dickerson, Deborah Blacker, Randy L. Buckner, et al. 2006. NeuroImage 31 (3): 968–80. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021.
Destrieux, Christophe, Bruce Fischl, Anders Dale, and Eric Halgren. 2010. NeuroImage 53 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.010.
Dick, Anthony Steven, Daniel A. Lopez, Ashley L. Watts, Steven Heeringa, Chase Reuter, Hauke Bartsch, Chun Chieh Fan, et al. 2021. NeuroImage 239 (October): 118262. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118262.
Dudley, Jonathan A., Thomas C. Maloney, John O. Simon, Gowtham Atluri, Sarah L. Karalunas, Mekibib Altaye, Jeffery N. Epstein, and Leanne Tamm. 2023. Neuroinformatics 21 (2): 323–37. doi:10.1007/s12021-023-09624-8.
Elman, Jeremy A., Matthew S. Panizzon, Donald J. Hagler, Christine Fennema-Notestine, Lisa T. Eyler, Nathan A. Gillespie, Michael C. Neale, et al. 2017. NeuroImage 146 (February): 90–99. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.032.
Fischl, Bruce, David H. Salat, Evelina Busa, Marilyn Albert, Megan Dieterich, Christian Haselgrove, Andre Van Der Kouwe, et al. 2002. Neuron 33 (3): 341–55. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00569-X.
Fortin, Jean-Philippe, Drew Parker, Birkan Tunç, Takanori Watanabe, Mark A. Elliott, Kosha Ruparel, David R. Roalf, et al. 2017. NeuroImage 161 (November): 149–70. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.047.
Hagler, Donald J., Mazyar E. Ahmadi, Joshua Kuperman, Dominic Holland, Carrie R. McDonald, Eric Halgren, and Anders M. Dale. 2009. Human Brain Mapping 30 (5): 1535–47. doi:10.1002/hbm.20619.
Hagler, Donald J., SeanN. Hatton, M. Daniela Cornejo, Carolina Makowski, Damien A. Fair, Anthony Steven Dick, Matthew T. Sutherland, et al. 2019. NeuroImage 202 (November): 116091. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116091.
Holland, Dominic, Joshua M. Kuperman, and Anders M. Dale. 2010. NeuroImage 50 (1): 175–83. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.044.
Jovicich, Jorge, Silvester Czanner, Douglas Greve, Elizabeth Haley, Andre Van Der Kouwe, Randy Gollub, David Kennedy, et al. 2006. NeuroImage 30 (2): 436–43. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.046.
Le Bihan, Denis, Jean-François Mangin, Cyril Poupon, Chris A. Clark, Sabina Pappata, Nicolas Molko, and Hughes Chabriat. 2001. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 13 (4): 534–46. doi:10.1002/jmri.1076.
Leemans, Alexander, and Derek K. Jones. 2009. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 61 (6): 1336–49. doi:10.1002/mrm.21890.
Palmer, Clare E., Diliana Pecheva, John R. Iversen, Donald J. Hagler, Leo Sugrue, Pierre Nedelec, Chun Chieh Fan, Wesley K. Thompson, Terry L. Jernigan, and Anders M. Dale. 2022. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 53 (February): 101044. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101044.
Pierpaoli, C, P Jezzard, P J Basser, A Barnett, and G Di Chiro. 1996. Radiology 201 (3): 637–48. doi:10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939209.
Smith, Stephen M., Mark Jenkinson, Mark W. Woolrich, Christian F. Beckmann, Timothy E. J. Behrens, Heidi Johansen-Berg, Peter R. Bannister, et al. 2004. NeuroImage 23 (January): S208–19. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051.
Wells, William M., Paul Viola, Hideki Atsumi, Shin Nakajima, and Ron Kikinis. 1996. Medical Image Analysis 1 (1): 35–51. doi:10.1016/S1361-8415(01)80004-9.
White, N. S., C. R. McDonald, N. Farid, J. M. Kuperman, S. Kesari, and A. M. Dale. 2013. American Journal of Neuroradiology 34 (5): 958–64. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3327.
White, Nathan S., Carrie R. McDonald, Niky Farid, Josh Kuperman, David Karow, Natalie M. Schenker-Ahmed, Hauke Bartsch, et al. 2014. Cancer Research 74 (17): 4638–52. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3534.
Zhuang, Jiancheng, Jan Hrabe, Alayar Kangarlu, Dongrong Xu, Ravi Bansal, Craig A. Branch, and Bradley S. Peterson. 2006. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 24 (5): 1188–93. doi:10.1002/jmri.20727.
 

ABCD Study®, Teen Brains. Today’s Science. Brighter Future.® and the ABCD Study Logo are registered marks of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development℠ Study is a service mark of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS).